|
|
 |
| Industry News |
You are here: Home > News > Industry News |
|
| Foreign Talent and China's Outward Investment |
| Date: [2010.05.05] Hits: 65 |
Recently, various regional Chinese authorities have held jobs fairs abroad aimed at attracting overseas Chinese professionals to fill jobs in various cities across China. At one event in New Jersey in November 2009, only a handful of candidates were of foreign descent.
As the U.S.-China economic relationship has deepened over the years, bilateral flows of capital, equipment and intellectual property, originally quite one-sided, have begun the long shift back to balance.
Chinese companies have always been on the leading edge of this shift. Several years ago, outward investments made by state-owned enterprises (SOEs) signaled that cash-rich China would venture outside the Middle Kingdom to secure supplies of natural resources. This was followed by deals made by private enterprises like Lenovo and, more recently, Geely.
Similarly, in the China intellectual property sphere, where cross-border IP flows used to be occupied solely by foreign companies, things began to change when Chinese enterprises with valuable brands like Tsingtao Beer, Hai’er, and Bank of China, began to venture abroad and protect their trademarks. Later on, acquisitions made by Lenovo and others involved Chinese companies securing famous foreign brands and technology.
Labor does not flow as easily across international borders as does capital and IP, but even so, we are seeing a change in cross-border labor practices, with the shift again coming from Chinese companies. The job fairs noted above are organized by municipalities but involve private and state-owned enterprises, solidifying a trend that began several years ago.
Ever since China opened its doors for business in 1978, there have been foreign workers in Beijing, Shanghai, Shenzhen and other large Eastern coastal cities. Since that time, however, the vast majority of business people and professionals have been employed by foreign invested enterprises, diplomatic missions, and educational institutions.
In my own industry, legal services, there were only a handful of foreign lawyers working for Chinese law firms back when I arrived in China in 1998. These days, many well established Chinese law firms in the major cities have an international department that includes foreign-credentialed lawyers.
Over the years, China has learned valuable business lessons from foreign invested enterprises, an education that helped to first build a solid export regime, and more recently to solidify Chinese firms’ dominance over the domestic market.
The knowledge spillover from foreign experts should not be underestimated, and the success of China’s move outward to overseas markets may ultimately rest on an enterprise’s ability to utilize foreign talent, employed in China and abroad, and integrate these individuals smoothly into the Chinese hierarchy. The track record of the Japanese in this regard in the 1970s and 1980s was uneven, an example that Chinese executives have no doubt studied closely.
As Chinese companies continue to move outward and, in addition to securing natural resources and infrastructure projects, acquire distribution networks, IP, and yes, even manufacturing facilities, their ability to draw upon a pool of global talent will be closely watched.
Stan Abrams
Professor, Central University of Finance & Economics Law School (Beijing)
Of Counsel, GoldenGate law firm (Beijing)
Founder and author, China Hearsay; co-founder and author, China/Divide
|
|
|
 |
|
Industry News
